Favorite card discussion: Dharc the Dark Charmer

He didn't said Ohm the same person as Doriado. Counterpart doesn't always looks similar to each other, just like Pikeru Curran or DMG and DM.

Anyway, Absolute Powerforce old support is interesting, but, it still annoying for Charmer fans. Where's the another form of Dharc? Now, we should wait for Shining Darkness. Probably it contain another form of Dharc and Light Charmer here, even the chance is a shit.

Oh... it's a misunderstanding. Sorry man.

And it will be interesting if Dharc has his FP form or konami released light charmer.

Shining Darkness would be perfect to release them IMO.
Shining = Light.
Darkness = Dark.

So probably gonna be Light and Dark Monsters.........*prays for no more Lightsworns or Blackwings*.

And they should make the DARK version of Holy Light (Holy Dark? lolz) in this set, to balance the game's LIGHT & DARK attribute because they're the strongest attribute in the current game, and because DARK has powered down because Holy Light, LIGHT should take the same thing. So, if Blackwings can get pwned by Holy Light, Lightsworns must get pwned too by Holy Dark. lol.

Konami, you're the best if you release the rest of Charmer cards here. I'm not really expecting for Charmers to be supported, but, please. Please release the rest of Dharc's card in this set, so it'll be fair for him...

I wish there was a Spell/Trap that was immune to destruction by anything, and it prevented your opponent from doing any kind of Summoning when it comes to LIGHT or DARK monsters, like a **** YOU! to the LS and BW XD.

I know they probably won't make support, But I at least want them to make the last of Dharc, and the Light Charmer in the Shining Darkness.

Edit: Yo Kaze, I've just noticed (dunno why just now) that you got a DeviantArt account. If you want to put Ippiki up, to see what others think, then go ahead, as long as you say I made it of course :3 .

Well, from 5 Charmer favorite card discussion topics, only Dharc's topic got so many replies.

@Yuji
lol, didn't you notice it since long time ago? That's what i thought. orz.
And i just posting Aki Izayoi instead of Ippiki recently, even i already decided before to post Ippiki first... orz.
Ok then, i'll post it later, but you must favorite it to make that Ippiki more popular. But, I probably wouldn't get any comment from other artists... as always, because some of my watchers are bunch of shit...

Quote :

Well, from 5 Charmer favorite card discussion topics, only Dharc's topic got so many replies.

That makes me curious. What makes Dharc so popular that he got so many replies on his thread?? Not Eria, not Hiita, not Wynn or Aussa. But it's Dharc. Is it because he is different from other charmers that he has no FP and other forms? or?

Kazemachi wrote:

Well, from 5 Charmer favorite card discussion topics, only Dharc's topic got so many replies.

Which has got me curious, I always thought all the Charmer topics would've been popular .

Kazemachi wrote:

@Yuji
lol, didn't you notice it since long time ago? That's what i thought. orz.
And i just posting Aki Izayoi instead of Ippiki recently, even i already decided before to post Ippiki first... orz.
Ok then, i'll post it later, but you must favorite it to make that Ippiki more popular. But, I probably wouldn't get any comment from other artists... as always, because some of my watchers are bunch of shit...

lol, I'll make sure I will XD. LOL@Bolded, we can't always expect someone to comment, no matter how much we want them to .

Why, thank you.

Anyway, do you know some people wants their number of artists they watch filled so much? Even it's easy to do, believe me, people like this exist on DA.
And yeah, what i said are true, because i appreciate the watchers that ever give at least 1 comment on profile/deviation, replying comment, tagging your name/deviation in their journal or etc, faving the deviation, viewing the deviation, or downloading the deviation. If they never do one of these act at least once (only watch), they're probably fake watcher it's same as a bunch of people you didn't know adding you as friend in some social site... but later you was ignored by them even they're active...
They didn't even reply if someone said thanks for the watch, and their account is ultimately dead if checked... this is really a shit...

And of course Dharc's topic getting more popular, because we several times talking about something other than Dharc in this thread...

Kazemachi wrote:

Why, thank you.

Anyway, do you know some people wants their number of artists they watch filled so much? Even it's easy to do, believe me, people like this exist on DA.
And yeah, what i said are true, because i appreciate the watchers that ever give at least 1 comment on profile/deviation, replying comment, tagging your name/deviation in their journal or etc, faving the deviation, viewing the deviation, or downloading the deviation. If they never do one of these act at least once (only watch), they're probably fake watcher it's same as a bunch of people you didn't know adding you as friend in some social site... but later you was ignored by them even they're active...
They didn't even reply if someone said thanks for the watch, and their account is ultimately dead if checked... this is really a shit...

And of course Dharc's topic getting more popular, because we several times talking about something other than Dharc in this thread...

Hmm... a bunch of people like this can be found in youtube too. You can see how many friends I have but only few who post a comment to my profile.

Kazemachi wrote:

Why, thank you.

Anyway, do you know some people wants their number of artists they watch filled so much? Even it's easy to do, believe me, people like this exist on DA.
And yeah, what i said are true, because i appreciate the watchers that ever give at least 1 comment on profile/deviation, replying comment, tagging your name/deviation in their journal or etc, faving the deviation, viewing the deviation, or downloading the deviation. If they never do one of these act at least once (only watch), they're probably fake watcher it's same as a bunch of people you didn't know adding you as friend in some social site... but later you was ignored by them even they're active...
They didn't even reply if someone said thanks for the watch, and their account is ultimately dead if checked... this is really a shit...

lol, Seems like it, I say if you get watched or something, and the one who did it doesn't bother to comment or something on your Artworks or do anything else, they shouldn't watch you .

Kazemachi wrote:

And of course Dharc's topic getting more popular, because we several times talking about something other than Dharc in this thread...

lol, Got a point there, like right now for example .

Well, that's true...

Anyway, let's back to the topic then...

Do you know who's "Servant of the Wicked" written in Meda Bat's description?
This should be a something that has a connection with Dharc...
What do you think?

are they wicked gods? oh wait, they are the wicked themselves... Or maybe Nuvia the Wicked? No. Statue of the wicked? No. No no no... it must be wicked worm beast.

Servant of Catabolism... lol...
Or maybe Dharc himself... orz...

Besides me necromancing... If you stared at the cards long enough, it's obvious why Dharc and Lyna wont get spiritual arts, Familiar Possessed, or Adult(i call it battle) forms.

Bump this thread guys!!


Guess who is this guy!





ANSWER : Familiar Possessed Dharc


Effect : By sending 1 "Dharc the Dark Charmer" and 1 DARK monster you control to the Graveyard, you can Special Summon this card from your hand or Deck. When this card is successfully Special Summoned in this way: You can add one Level 3 or Level 4 LIGHT Spellcaster-Type monster from your deck to your hand. In addition, if this card was successfully Special Summoned this way, during battle between this attacking card and a Defense Position monster whose DEF is lower than the ATK of this card, inflict the difference as Battle Damage to your opponent's Life Points.

First off:

NO. FUCKING. WAY.

===

Second:

HAH! With that appearance, no one can say Dharc is a girl now!

How come Dharc got a FP form before Lyna did?! TT~TT

And anyone else thinks his/her effect has something to do with Lyna...?

Will Lair wrote:

How come Dharc got a FP form before Lyna did?! TT~TT

And anyone else thinks his/her effect has something to do with Lyna...?

Lyna appears later after Dharc. so, deal with it.

Not just Lyna. Lyla, Milla, Magician Valkyria, etc. So many of them.

...Man. Dharc has become a girl charmer now.

Ayai-chan wrote:

First off:

NO. FUCKING. WAY.

===

Second:

HAH! With that appearance, no one can say Dharc is a girl now!

He is too masculine to be called a girl. Or maybe they wanna say Dharc is a reverse trap?

Holy shit.........Epic in a can

Will Lair wrote:

Kirikaze Fuuma wrote:

...Man. Dharc has become a girl charmer now.

ZING!

Will... that's way too one liner. Sorry but I'll delete it.

~Fuuma

Alright, I must have Familiar Possessed Dharc at any cost.
and Dharc and the other forms of Drarc are Male.

Wait a minute... is that a new skull-staff?

And now, my quest to complete the charmer set will continue. Hopefully, it will be a fine addition to my deck.

In thought(OH MY GOSH!!! Finally, FP DHARC!!! IT'S ABOUT THEY DID THIS!!!)

Well it's about flippin' time!

First off... OMGWTFROFLCOPTER.

Second, does anyone else see twilight decks that are leaning towards a more fun theme using this guy?
Charmer + Dark =FP + Lightsworn/Honest, etc.

I think at this stage, I'm going to believe the theory that the rest of the Charmers are dead after Elemental burst, and that Dharc and Lyna are the only ones left o.o